Minds, machines and Searle
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Minds, machines and Searle
Searle's celebrated Chinese Room Argument has shaken the foundations of Artificial Intelligence. Many refutations have been attempted, but none seem convincing. This paper is an attempt to sort out explicitly the assumptions and the logical, methodological and empirical points of disagreement. Searle is shown to have underestimated some features of computer modeling, but the heart of the issue ...
متن کاملGödel, Nagel, Minds and Machines
Just fifty years ago, Ernest Nagel and Kurt Gödel became involved in a serious imbroglio about the possible inclusion of Gödel's original work on incompleteness in the book, Gödel's Proof, then being written by Nagel with James R. Newman. What led to the conflict were some unprecedented demands that Gödel made over the use of his material and his involvement in the contents of the bookdemands ...
متن کاملConnectionism Reconsidered: Minds, Machines and Models
In this paper the issue of drawing inferences about biological cognitive systems on the basis of connectionist simulations is addressed. In particular, the justification of inferences based on connectionist models trained using the backpropagation learning algorithm is examined. First it is noted that a justification commonly found in the philosophical literature is inapplicable. Then some gene...
متن کاملMinds and Machines: a Radical Dualist Perspective
The article begins with a discussion about what might constitute consciousness in entities other than oneself and the implications of the mindbrain debate for the possibility of a conscious machine. While referring to several other facets of the philosophy of mind, the author focuses on epiphenomenalism and interactionism and presents a critique of the former in terms of biological evolution. ...
متن کامل1 Gödel , Nagel , minds and machines
1. The imbroglio between Nagel and Gödel. Some fifty years ago (1957 to be exact), Ernest Nagel and Kurt Gödel became involved in a contentious exchange about the possible inclusion of Gödel’s original work on incompleteness in the book, Gödel’s Proof, then being written by Nagel with James R. Newman. What led to the conflict were some unprecedented demands that Gödel made over the use of his m...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence
سال: 1989
ISSN: 0952-813X,1362-3079
DOI: 10.1080/09528138908953691